Human only
ARCFlow has no approve-by-algorithm path
Approval, conditional approval, and denial require a complete current intake review, verified file bytes, a named decision maker, decision date, authority record, and written note.
For boards & ARC coordinators
The committee meets Thursday. The packet is still in six emails.
Bring the request, required items, exact file fingerprints, completeness history, policy source, due date, and named decision authority into one review record.
No autonomous approval or denial · every live policy is source-backed and human-reviewed
ARC-00042 · fence replacement
Project descriptionreceived · SHA-256 verifieddone
Site planreceived · reviewer confirmeddone
Material samplemissing · owner follow-uplive
0design decisions made by software
1reviewed policy version on every request
$39flat per month
The daily grind
A form is not a review system.
The owner sent a drawing, then a revised drawing, then a photo. The checklist is in a PDF, the clock is on somebody's calendar, and the decision will live in meeting notes.
01
Receipt looks complete
An upload confirmation does not prove every configured intake item is present.
02
The clock silently moves
New documents reset spreadsheet dates even when the governing process says the clock continues.
03
The wrong file reaches the vote
Nobody can identify which exact drawing or sample the committee reviewed.
04
Automation crosses the authority line
A model score or checklist is treated like approval, denial, or governing-document interpretation.
What it does
Administrative clarity. Human authority.
ARCFlow prepares and preserves the record while the authorized board or committee retains every substantive decision.
§
Reviewed policy
Citation, required items, clock basis, and days activate only after named human review.
⌁
Exact evidence
Each drawing, form, photo, or sample record carries a SHA-256 fingerprint.
◷
Clock that does not drift
Submitted- or complete-basis deadlines come from the preserved policy version.
✓
Completeness without overclaiming
Complete means the configured intake items are present and verified—not compliant, safe, permitted, or approvable.
▤
Meeting-ready packet
Policy source, project summary, evidence manifest, review history, deadline, decision, authority record, and conditions stay together.
How it works
Configure. Collect. Confirm. Convene.
STEP 01
Activate the reviewed process
Cite the current authority and verify the intake list and clock.
STEP 02
Collect the exact packet
Preserve each configured item under its content fingerprint.
STEP 03
Review administrative completeness
A named human confirms what is present; incomplete packets stay visibly incomplete.
STEP 04
Record the authorized outcome
The committee decides; ARCFlow records who, when, under what authority, and with which conditions.
Pricing
Less than one lost drawing, missed clock, or disputed decision trail.
Start with one association's current architectural-review procedure and five recent requests.
Free
$0
Rebuild one review packet.
- Up to 5 open requests
- One reviewed policy
- Evidence fingerprints
- Meeting packet export
Founding rate
$39/mo
The accountable review docket.
- Unlimited request packets
- Superseding policy versions
- Append-only completeness history
- Deadline queue and calendar
- Human decision and conditions record
- Rate locked for life
Questions
Before you ask.
Does ARCFlow approve or deny projects?
No. ARCFlow does not approve or deny a project and has no automated decision function. It verifies packet bytes and records the outcome supplied by a named authorized human.
What does administratively complete mean?
Only that every intake item configured in the reviewed policy is present and its current evidence verifies. It is not a finding about design standards, governing documents, permits, engineering, setbacks, drainage, or law.
Can a revised drawing restart the clock?
ARCFlow does not silently reset a started clock. The preserved policy says whether the clock starts at submission or administrative completeness; disputes go to the association's qualified reviewer.
Can we change a final decision?
Final decision rows are immutable. A mistaken record must be frozen and escalated through an explicit correction process—not edited until history looks clean.
Get started
Give the committee the packet—not the inbox archaeology.
Join the early-access pilot with one current policy and five recent requests.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click, honored immediately.